magical swirls in the sky. bright colors with a castle in the background but with day of the dead vibes

A Different Kind of Card Game

My first Disney Lorcana prerelease was a lot of fun.

I've been interested in Lorcana for a while, particularly because of the Disney artwork and the Enchanted cards. But there is a difference between admiring a trading card game from the outside and actually sitting down to play it.

This was my first time playing Lorcana in a somewhat competitive setting. The format was straightforward: we opened six booster packs and built a deck from the cards we pulled. Then we played best-of-three rounds against other players.

I finished with two wins and one loss.

Not a bad start for someone still learning the game.

But the result wasn't the most interesting part of the experience. What caught my attention was how different Lorcana felt from Magic: The Gathering, and how that difference changed which cards stood out to me.

Magic and Lorcana Reward Different Ways of Thinking

Coming from Magic, I'm used to looking for interactions between cards, efficient removal spells, and ways to create an advantage that eventually leads to a win.

Lorcana felt different.

During the prerelease, the Evasive characters seemed particularly important. Characters with Evasive can challenge other characters with Evasive, making them more difficult for opponents to interact with through ordinary challenges.

That stood out to me because it changed how I evaluated the cards in my deck. A character didn't necessarily need to be the biggest or flashiest card to make an impact. Sometimes, having the right ability made it much more useful than its stats alone suggested.

I'm still learning Lorcana, so I'm not ready to make sweeping claims about its competitive metagame. A prerelease deck built from six random packs is very different from a carefully constructed competitive deck.

Still, it gave me something to think about: the cards that look impressive in a collection aren't always the cards that make the biggest difference during a game.

That distinction matters to collectors and investors, too. Gameplay can contribute to demand, but understanding which cards players actually want requires more than looking at artwork or rarity.

The Cards I Pulled—and Actually Enjoyed Playing

A few cards stood out during the event. They weren't necessarily the most expensive cards in the set, but they were memorable because I got to play with them.

The Judy Hopps promo was one of the highlights of my prerelease.

I pulled the promo and used it in my deck. Promo cards in general tend to hold their value so it was nice to get one out of the prerelease box. At around $9, it wasn't an enormous hit from a financial perspective. But it was a card I was genuinely happy to get.

That's part of what makes opening trading cards enjoyable in the first place. A pull doesn't need to be worth hundreds of dollars to feel like a win.

Shere Khan was another card that caught my attention. Its value was around $8 based on what I saw, but what interested me more was how I could imagine the card fitting into a more competitive deck.

I don't have enough experience with Lorcana yet to make a confident prediction about its tournament potential. Still, Shere Khan was the card that made me want to explore the game's deeper strategy.

That's an interesting starting point for future research: when does a card that performs well in a limited environment also have the tools to become desirable in constructed play?

The answer won't always be yes. But it's a question worth investigating before making an investment.

Wasabi was another memorable pull, this time in an Epic foil treatment.

I enjoyed having it in the mix, and the foil treatment made the card particularly appealing from a collector's perspective.

But I'm trying to separate those two reactions. Enjoying a card and believing it will appreciate in value are different things. To make the latter judgment, I'd need to examine its supply, demand, competitive relevance, and current price.

For now, it's simply one of the cards from the event that I'll remember.

Priscilla was another notable pull from the packs I opened.

Not every card needs its own investment thesis. Sometimes it's enough to discover a character or card that makes the game more enjoyable—and learn a little more about the set along the way.

That was the theme of the day: I came away with cards I enjoyed playing, even without pulling the big chase card I had hoped to find.

No Enchanted Pulls

Like many collectors, I was hoping to pull an Enchanted card.

I didn't.

I won some additional packs from the tournament, but none of those delivered an Enchanted either.

That's the reality of opening trading cards. The possibility of pulling something special is exciting, but the outcome is never guaranteed. Even a fun event can end without the biggest hit.

And that's one reason I want to be thoughtful about how I approach Lorcana as an investment.

Opening packs is entertainment. Buying a single is a decision about a specific asset. Holding sealed product is a different bet on future demand, supply, and the appeal of the set as a whole.

Those decisions shouldn't be treated as interchangeable.

Why I Bought a Sealed Hyperia City Booster Box

After the tournament, I decided to purchase a Hyperia City booster box for approximately $140.

My plan is to keep it sealed.

This is where the experience shifted from simply enjoying the game to thinking about the market. I had spent the afternoon playing Lorcana, discovered cards I liked, and gained a better appreciation for the set. That made me more interested in owning a piece of it for the longer term.

But enjoying the set isn't enough to establish that the box is a good investment.

The investment case still needs to be tested. I'd want to understand how much product is available, how supply changes after release, what collectors are willing to pay, and how demand develops once the initial excitement fades.

A sealed box can benefit if collectors continue to want the set and available supply becomes harder to find. It can also disappoint if the market receives plenty of product or if demand fails to keep pace with the price.

At approximately $140, I've made a purchase that I'm comfortable holding and learning from. That doesn't mean I can confidently predict what it will be worth in one, two, or three years.

For now, I'm treating it as a long-term speculative position—not a proven investment thesis.

What I'm Watching Next

The prerelease gave me a reason to become more interested in Lorcana. Now I want to learn how the market behaves.

There are four areas I want to follow.

1. Enchanted cards and collector demand

The artwork is one of the main reasons Lorcana caught my attention. I want to understand which characters and treatments collectors pursue most aggressively, how prices compare across cards, and whether the demand holds after release.

2. Competitive relevance

I'm new to the game, so I won't pretend to know which cards will become staples. But I'll be watching how cards perform in constructed play and whether competitive demand adds another layer to their appeal.

3. Sealed product availability

I want to track the price of Hyperia City booster boxes and see how the market changes after launch. The important question isn't simply whether the price rises or falls. It's whether the price offers enough potential upside to justify the risks.

4. The difference between a collectible and an investment

Some cards will appeal to me because I love the characters or artwork. Others might be interesting because of their gameplay, scarcity, or demand. Occasionally, a card might check several of those boxes.

The challenge is determining whether the price already reflects those qualities.

That's the part of Lorcana I want to explore through Pack Portfolio.

My First Lorcana Takeaway

I went to my first Lorcana prerelease expecting to have a good time. I came away with a better understanding of the game, a 2–1 record, several memorable pulls, and a sealed booster box I'm looking forward to following.

I also came away with more questions than answers—and that's a good thing.

I don't need to pretend to be a Lorcana expert to start researching the market. I need to be clear about what I've learned, what I still need to investigate, and why I believe a particular purchase might make sense.

Magic: The Gathering remains a market I know better. Lorcana gives me an opportunity to apply the same investment discipline to a game I'm discovering from the beginning.

For now, I'm happy with the experience and curious about what comes next. The booster box is staying sealed, and the research is just getting started.

RESEARCH. COLLECT. INVEST.

Pack Portfolio is an independent research publication focused on trading cards as collectible assets. Our opinions are our own and are not financial advice. Prices change quickly, and readers should conduct their own research before buying or selling any collectible.

Want to start your own Newsletter?

I publish Pack Portfolio on Beehiiv.

If you'd like to try it, you can use my link for a discount.

Disclosure: This is a referral link. If you sign up through it, I may earn a reward at no extra cost to you.